How did Abelard respond to this problem, originally raised by Porphyry’s questions?
If there are no universals, as nominalism claims, then how is our knowledge of logic, mathematics, and other “class concepts” explained?
How did Abelard respond to this problem, originally raised by Porphyry’s questions?
If there are no universals, as nominalism claims, then how is our knowledge of logic, mathematics, and other “class concepts” explained?